About your Search

20110701
20110731
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)
. >> the largest possible deal. >>chris: the president wants to go big so why are the numbers going down? welcome, everyone, i am here for neil cavuto in "your world." a new round of debt talks get under way at the white house but it is not all smiles. because the president's listen is not looking so grand. we have gone from talk of $2 trillion in cuts to $1.7 trillion and now closer to $1.5 trillion. and there is in guarantee that money won't go lower as the talks drag on. utah republican senator lee thinks we need to go back but $1.5 trillion in cuts spread out over ten years is that going big? >>guest: no, in the big at all. i am not sure it is going anywhere. one congress cannot bind another congress. so no matter how big the cuts are, if they are stretched out over 10 years and not accompanied by a constitutional amendment we have no guarantee they will be followed. >>chris: do you get a sense both sides are trying to get a deal and making it small enough to be palatable because the democrats and the administration will not make a big deal without tax increases, so both will take small incre
: unless i put a big fat canoli in front of you. >>neil: the idea is we have to get jobs going, and you talk about what is making your life difficult, regulation and price of oil and gasoline which prohibits people from buying bakery products but this must not be encouraging. >> it is more lip service to the public. it is nothing but a constant game of, what can we say to cover our butts? there is no fact. it is all fiction. these people can suddenly say if we don't get this done we will go into the worst depression we have ever seen. but, see you later because i have to have hotdogs and beer this weekend. i got a bakery to run and when your producer so-called, in st. louis the heat index is 105 and i'm on the roof doing tar flashing and thinking, well, are they stretched back on the first-class seat on the way home or maybe riding in the personal airport that the president wants to tax everybody on, on their way home for the weekend because they needed to get there quick. it's more lip service. it shows, truly shows, truly how much our bigs get it and how much they care. i don't know h
quarter on g.d.p. growth, and that is the debate on wall street. >> i will show the big board again if we can, a lot of you will look at this and say 200 points because washington is not doing anything, that is part but it is not the majority of what is happening here. a lot of this is having to do with concerns of slow down is happening and we could revisit a serious slow down, if not a double dip, companies lime emerson saying things have turned south. i am not dismissing what is beginning on in washington but for wall street the front burner issue is the concern of the double dip. that is the reality. and, then, there is this. (inaudible) fabio challenges you at 9:00 a.m. on the internet. >>neil: taking on the old spice guy and now, he is responding. >> i accept your challenge. >>neil: if you think that is spicy enter another, and we have the real spice, live from washington. me. we are ear all over the spicy hot debt battle with some of the biggest names in the business kicking off at 4:00 p.m. with mark levin and many others, the big budget brawl continues, alive this weekend on satu
administration owes us a big answer. >> the rob is not everybody agrees as hard as it is for us to believe. the evidence is in the circumstantial, they were his bite marks on her body. the evidence is strong. but the mexican government and there are a lot of people in the international community that are saying, look, we don't think he got a fair trial and there could be u.s. citizens at risk abroad if you don't follow the policy of the treaty. >>guest: see, this is why it is a political issue and not a legal issue and that is why i am outraged. he would not play politics with the death of another kind of person, it had to be a girl and is sex crime. look, here is the issue. we do have a treaty with mexico. but if there was a country where we shouldn't be overly concerned about respecting the treaty rules, it is mexico. they have, in the few years ago, a report was done by the justice department saying mexico is out of line, disrespectful of treaty responsibilities with the united states when it comes to our citizens having legal issues and dilemmas in mexico. what are we doing? why with t
the beginning. >> a big reason why ron paul wants to focus on his presidential bid announcing today he will not seek another term in the house of representatives. and now in the first television interview since that surprise announcement the g.o.p. candidate will be on sbn tonight at 6:00. you don't get it? demand it! she called it a death panel and now some democrats agree, the list of lawmakers against the cost control board is growing. could it spell death for the health care law? he reports and you be the judge. stay tuned. woman: saving for our child's college fund was getting expensive. man: yes it was. so to save some money, we taught our 5 year old how to dunk. woman: scholarship! woman: honey go get him. anncr: there's an easier way to save. get online. go to geico.com. get a quote. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on car insurance. >> opposition growing not from republicans but from democrats over a controversial health care advisory board. at least eight democrats now want the independent board gone. it is a board the republicans call "a death panel." but the judge say
. cut, cap and balance, a big victory for house republicans last night, but, you would not know it today watching the white house press briefing. we counted just two questions about the g.o.p. plan, one to ask if it was a waste of time versus 14 for the "gang of six" plan which the president favors. tim graham not surprised a media research center worker. you thing the media is pushing the president toward the democrat plan, right? >>guest: they are failing to explain what the republican plan is. that you could go back through the transcripts and try to find the network using the word "cut, cap and balance." this is something that the house republicans have been formulating almost virtual media silence. they do not feel it is necessary to describe what it is but to just begin by announcing when it actually passes they say it is a failure and a waste of time. it is quite extraordinarily. >>stuart: some of the language they are using it calling it the ill fated cut, cap and balance, and those words tend to be attached to cut, cap and balance. ill fated was in "the hill," and there are othe
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)